Exercise from a general standpoint can have healthy benefits and prolong your life to the degree where you can get injured less, have strength than the average person and carry out greater endurance but which area of exercise are you at? What area of exercise do most people gear towards when it comes to bodyweight? Animal Exercise or Calisthenics? In my opinion, most take on calisthenics which is the stationary style exercise system of push-ups, squats, sit-ups, pull-ups, jumps, handstands and other of the like. We learned calisthenics in P.E class or certain aspects of gym work but as oppose to yesteryear, calisthenics are a mark for business that tends to overload info on exercises that are beyond the basics for most to learn and the more advanced they are, the more divided it becomes.
Animal Exercises are simple and to the point by utilizing the mentality of mimicking wild animals. Unlike calisthenics where you're in a certain spot, you're moving about in your surroundings in a more natural setting; crawling, jumping, balancing and running. I'm not saying calisthenics aren't natural but today's calisthenics seem to be blown way out of proportion that we can't tell what's natural in that method of exercise. There are benefits to both and have a great deal of teaching the body how it handles itself through practice of pushing, pulling, squatting and using the core in ways you can't get from weight training. The majority of calisthenics training focuses on specific muscles while having the whole body engaged. Animal Movements in and of themselves focuses on every muscle in the body whether you're in a lower body or upper position.
Both have gone through transformations which can be both good and bad. The good is where we learn what we're capable of and transitioning from a certain exercise to the next and developing advanced forms of movement that separate us from a beginner to world-class athleticism and conditioning. The bad is where they overload the info and program the methods with different names, names of exercises and certain movements that the average person or world-class athlete shouldn't be doing. Here's the mindset I've seen in certain people; when you see a regular push-up, it's basic and shows that anyone whether beginner or world-class can do but it also looks boring as oppose to say a planche where the feet are off the ground and holding the body up with no more than the arms and being so flexed and balanced, it looks cool and something that doesn't seem possible at first.
Let's now transition to the bear crawl; simply get on all fours with your butt in the air and start walking around. We did this as little kids and when it came to sports, it was pushed even further by just running in that position in Football & Wrestling. As simple as it is, it can bring down the toughest athletes. Nowadays, the very same bear crawl has you having a more straight back, moving opposite arm and leg and not moving as fast. That's awesome for starting out and developing the body in a different manner plus making more use of the brain and nerve endings. I prefer the old school method and just go for a stroll or a sprint. How about the Pull-up, these days most don't learn how to even do a regular pull-up, they're either kipping or swinging their body up or trying too hard to transition from two-arm to one-arm and not considering the basic principles. Pull-ups whether you're new or have done them for years are hard as it is and just because you increase the reps doesn't make you a better practitioner, just means you're doing more reps.
The main point to this article is seeing not only the differences in each method but to show that with basic principles, both are very beneficial and to be careful of who teaches them because if someone barely teaches the basics, they're not doing their job right. I also believe in quality over quantity. Now with certain exercises, it may not look pretty but if you don't get injured and the quality you provide works for you it's still better than how many reps you can do. Most people won't do 500 reps of an exercise but if they do quality repetition that makes the reps have significance, that's really awesome. When it comes to animal movements, quality isn't a huge thing but has to do more with coordination. Repetition is useful but reps in this manner are geared towards taking steps or going a certain distance (Feet, yards, meters or whatever) and the better coordinated you are, the more you can keep going.
It doesn't look like it takes much strength to do animal exercises but it's a different kind of strength where just holding yourself up in a crawling position takes more strength than one realizes. Like the bear crawl, you're moving using your arms and your legs for a period of time. Now because you're moving at a certain clip, you're using greater strength in your arms because it's like using another pair of legs. We can run well and sprint and walk on our legs but if we were doing the same but with our arms, imagine the level of strength or in other words Conditioned Strength that you can have.
Although I prefer Animal Exercises over Calisthenics, both give tremendous benefits to our health and fitness but sticking to the basics goes a much longer way than any advanced movement. As we get older, our bodies won't always get the same effect and those advanced movements will at some point be virtually non existent. Yes, it is amazing to see a man or woman in their later years to advanced exercises but those who are in their 50's up until over 100 doing basic push-ups or squats, doing crawls with ease are far more awesome looking to me. Keep up with the basics and you'll be far better off, do advanced movements if you wish but the basics will keep you going longer.
